LDS-HEA Conference 2006 Speakers
Paul T. Mero, biography
As President of the Sutherland Institute, Paul has been instrumental in influencing public policy and in legislative issues. He and his wife, Sally, have six children and two grandchildren.
Paul will address how home schooling relates to freedom and how every one of us has the opportunity to extend freedom or curtail it based on our own family and parental efforts.
Before joining the Sutherland Institute, Paul served as the executive vice president of the Howard Center for Family, Religion, and Society in Rockford, Illinois. He spent over a decade working in Congress and on Capitol Hill. A veteran of the pro-family political movement, he also administered the Second World Congress of Families meeting in Geneva, Switzerland. Paul received his BA in Public Policy from Brigham Young University.
See the Sutherland Institute website to read the articles Paul has written.
Paul is also co-author of The Natural Family: A Manifesto, together with the Howard Center. Its purpose is "to re-focus the national and international pro-family movements - to state affirmatively what they stand for - and to inspire the familial sentiments in all of us to, once again, cherish the natural family." Read The Natural Family: A Manifesto
After the Conference
Sutherland
Institute's new website, Announced
January 26, 2007
Note the Utah
taxpayer's spending clock on the left sidebar.
http://www.sutherlandinstitute.org/
| There's
no place like home for talented Mero hoopsters
Deseret Morning
News, January 5, 2007 SANDY — There are not
many families who can claim four boys who are all
exceptionally gifted basketball players. Furthermore,
the Mero family is set apart by one additional
discriminating factor: They are home schooled. |
||
Jeremy Harmon, Deseret Morning News
Cameron Mero, who played for Jordan and then
Alameda College in Oakland, Calif., now attends
SLCC.
|
Brian Nicholson, Deseret Morning News
Jordan High's Brigham Mero (33) drives toward the
hoop against the defensive pressure of Dallin
Shakespear of Escalante.
|
|
More
money won't help failed education system
Deseret Morning
News, Sunday, October 08, 2006
More money won't
help failed education system
By Paul T.
Mero
Utah suffers from several education
paradoxes, but the one we always hear about — lots of money
thrown at public schools but low per pupil funding — isn't one
of them. It's a false paradox, as is its latest variation,
"Paradox Lost." Statistical anomalies are hardly
policy paradoxes and, in these cases, neither portends an
existing or looming crisis in education.
A paradox is defined in several ways. As used above, it once
meant that we really didn't spend as much on education as we
thought we did, and its latest iteration means the same thing.
Both are false paradoxes for two reasons. First, education
spending is not a high correlate for academic achievement and,
second, the paradoxes are relative statistical comparisons
(i.e., meaningless outside of political circles advocating for
more education money).
If you are looking for real education paradoxes you can find
them.
First, increases in education spending don't make any child
smarter. Money has little to do with academic achievement. The
Utah public school system could be "fully funded,"
whatever that means, and its students would not do any better.
We could spend $20,000 per child in our public school system and
not increase IQs or test scores one iota.
Does money buy better teachers? Of course it can. Our private
school neighbors have taught us that. Unfortunately, our public
school system prefers not to evaluate teachers by ability;
therefore more money is meaningless. On the other hand, our
home-school neighbors paint for us a truer picture — academic
success can be accomplished at very little monetary cost.
Second, parental involvement is much more valuable than money.
This factor is most evident in home and private schooling.
Again, unfortunately, our public school system devalues parental
involvement. Try to do more than take cookies into a classroom
and every parent will soon find out how much they're really
appreciated. Of course the system loves parents who willingly
serve its own programs like PTA. But try having an independent
thought that bucks the system and you'll be treated like weird
Uncle Henry at Thanksgiving dinner.
Third, the public school system works against its public purpose. They think Dewey when they should think Jefferson. The real public interest in educating children is to civilize them, not socialize them. Socialized, but uncivilized, children will still throw rocks through your window or steal your car. Civilized children form the future basis of a free society. Education should be about character, not some idealized and wholly unrealistic sense of community.
Fourth, very good and well-intentioned people defend a failed system. Every Utah neighborhood is filled with wonderfully dedicated people who work within the public school system. We thank them and admire them. In many cases, we feel for how their brilliance is dimmed by a heavy-handed system. Anything brilliant cannot long endure a culture of mediocrity.
Public schools will either be based upon the hope of excellence or the illusion of equity. In every other walk of life Utahns know that freedom is the only one-size-fits-all system that works. This is especially true in education.
Lastly, the more public-school advocates try to protect the current system, the worse it gets. The system is broke because it is being asked to do more than it is able — and that unbearable burden is driven by the unquenchable thirst for money. More money isn't the answer to any question regarding public schools. The real education paradox is that parents and taxpayers continue to fund and tolerate good intentions in a failed system.
Paul T. Mero is president of the Sutherland Institute, a conservative public policy think tank.